|
In my wilder imaginative moments, I fantasized about being a
"Damsel-in-
Distress" or "Female-in-Peril" in different
situations. What follows
are crude attempts to convey these fantasies in the way of
photo-manipulated images.
One of the
great female artists in my Erotic-Art Collection once told me that it
was her experience that actual role-playing was never as good as she was
imagining or hoping it would be. She was holding out hope that
perhaps
someday she would have a satisfying rendezvous.
With that in
mind, I cannot say for sure that I would enjoy each and every one
of these fantasies in an actual role-playing encounter. I don't
know until
I tried it. Of course, there are the usual concerns with regard to
safety,
disease, etc. But I'm just "testing the waters" to see
if anyone would be
interested. If I ever do something like one of this, you would
probably
never see it because the other persons would want their identities
kept private. Or so I guess.
There have been some recent laws that were designed to protect
underaged
minors from being exploited. As best as I understand them, any
real photograph
that depicts an explicit sexual scene (e.g., intercourse) has to have
the
actor/actress'
names/ages/addresses on-file with that posting website's
"Keeper of the Records". This is so that law enforcement
agencies can
check on what might appear to be an underaged minor.
This does not apply (again, as best as I interpret it) to scenes such
as nudity,
bondage,
photo-manipulations, etc. And some officials have exceeded their
duties by using these laws to obtain the street addresses of the
actors/actresses
for purposes of dating. It is of no surprise that many lawsuits
are pending in the
courts on principles such as invasion of privacy.
The
U.S. Supreme Court ruled in February, 2002 that artwork
(including cartoons,
3D "poser" art, manipulations etc.) was considered
"fantasy" and protected
under Freedom of Speech.
In addition, "child
on-line protection" laws (ca. 1998) which
required websites to
ascertain the age of a browser have been in legal
limbo pending
many appeals.
The courts favor parents installing "filtering"
software on their kids'
computers
so as to not infringe upon
Free
Speech rights of adults
.
If something "fell through the cracks" or new laws have been
passed and a law
enforcement agency thinks it is illegal, e-mail me using your official
letterhead at
barbieisbad@yahoo.com
-or- kelli@hotlegsinlove.com
or e-mail my website host (support@datarealm.com)
with reference to the actual
images. No need to make the proverbial "federal case"
out of something when
it can be quickly resolved. I figure that if I make things easier
for you,
the same will be extended to me.
 
<= the difference between real-life Violence
and Fantasy Adult Role-Playing
<= suspension of the 1998 child on-line
protection act pending court appeal
|
